There are a number of significant changes to Canadian tax
law that will have a significant impact on estate planning. I have written
about the elimination of graduation income rates for testamentary trusts,
including a post here. That change, though most unwelcome, at least doesn’t
come as a surprise, in view of the previous consultation by the Minister of
Finance and that it was announced in the 2014 Budget. One change that does come
as a surprise is that the Government is making a significant change to how
alter ego and joint partner trusts are taxed, a change that could cause some
significant unforeseen consequences to estate plans.
I wrote some time ago about the use of alter ego and joint
partner trusts. An alter ego trust is a trust settled by a Canadian resident
who is at least 65 years old. Under the terms of the alter ego trust, all of
the income must be payable to the settlor during his or her lifetime, and only
the settlor may have access to capital during his or her life. Then on the
settlor’s death, the trust property may be distributed to other beneficiaries
as set out in the trust documents. The advantages include that the settlor may
transfer appreciated assets into the trust without triggering capital gains or
other income tax, and such tax may be deferred until the death of the settlor.
Alter ego trusts may avoid or minimize probate fees (because the trust is not
probated), maximize privacy, and may in some circumstances be used to protect
assets against claims in British
Columbia under wills variation legislation.
Joint partner trusts are similar, except that the income
must be paid to either or both the settlor and his or her spouse or common-law
partner (as those terms are defined under the Income Tax Act (Canada), but for
simplicity, I will refer to both as “spouses”), during their joint lives, and
capital may be distributed to either or both spouses, until the death of the
surviving spouse, at which time the trust property may be distributed as set
out in the trust documents.
Under the current tax rules, the alter ego trust is deemed
to have disposed of all of its assets immediately after the date of death of
the settlor. The effect of this is that any capital gains or other taxes are
taxed in the alter ego trust, at the top income tax rate. Although paid out of
the trust, the incidence of the tax ultimately falls on the beneficiaries of
the trust by reducing the trust property. In some cases, using an alter ego
trusts results in a higher overall tax than if the assets had just remained as
part of the settlor’s estate, because of the high tax rate in the trust, as
opposed to the graduated rates available in the settlor’s year of death in
respect of taxes triggered by the deemed disposition of those of the settlor’s
assets that are not in a trust. Furthermore, capital losses in the trust cannot
be used to offset gains of property that are not in the trust, and vice versa.
Similarly, for a joint partner trust, the deemed disposition
occurs immediately after the death of the last to die of the spouses, and as
with the alter ego trust, the tax is paid out of the trust property at the top
tax rate, and not the marginal rate available to either of the spouses.
Under the changes that are coming into effect in 2016, the
taxes arising from the deemed disposition of trust property at the death of the
settlor in an alter ego trust will be treated as the settlor’s income in the
settlor’s year of death and payable out of the settlor’s estate. If there are
insufficient funds in the estate, then the Canada Revenue Agency may collect
the tax out of the trust property.
In a joint partner trust, the taxes arising from the deemed
disposition of the trust property on the death of the last of the spouses to
die will be treated as the income of the last of the spouses to die and will be
payable out of his or her estate, unless there are insufficient funds, in which
case Canada Revenue Agency may collect the tax out of the trust property.
In some cases, this may reduce the overall tax burden of the
estate and the trust. This is because the graduated tax rates should apply to
income from the deemed disposition death including the disposition of assets in
the trust which would under current rules be taxed at the top rate.
Furthermore, tax losses and credits available in the deceased terminal return
should be available to reduce gains and taxes that would otherwise be payable
in the trust. Similarly, losses in the trust may be available to offset gains on property owned by the deceased.
There may be some advantages under the new rules. But no,
the Government was not doing us a favour. There is a significant downside to
the changes.
Under the current rules, the taxes in respect of the deemed
disposition of trust property is ultimately borne by the beneficiaries of the
trust, while under the new rules, it will be borne by the beneficiaries of the
estate of the settlor of an alter ego trust, or the estate of the last of the
spouses to die, in the case of a joint partner trust.
Consider this example of how it might work. Jim and Janet
are married, and each comes into the marriage with his or her own assets, and
each has two children. Janet owns a cottage and a large portfolio of
investments, and she transfers both into a joint partner trust “the Janet Joint
Partner Trust.” Under the terms of the trust, income is payable to either or
both of Janet and Jim while they are both alive, and then if Jim outlives
Janet, he will continue to receive income, and have use of the cottage during
his lifetime. Janet has set up the trust so that on his death, the trust
property goes to her own children. Jim has a similar estate plan. His will
provides income from his, more modest property, to Janet if she outlives him,
but on her death, his property goes to his own children. Janet dies first. Under
the current rules, on Jim’s death any capital gains on the Janet Joint Partner
Trust property are paid out of the trust, reducing the property that will go to
Janet’s children. Any capital gains tax on Jim’s own property is payable out of
his estate, reducing the amount that his children will receive. But if Jim dies
in 2016 or later, then the taxes in respect of both the Janet Joint Partner Trust
property and Jim’s own property will be payable out of Jim’s estate, which
means that the incidence of the tax will fall entirely on Jim’s children.
Janet’s children would only bear part of the tax if Jim’s estate was
insufficient to pay the full amount of tax, in which case, Jim’s children will
have been completely disinherited as a result to the changes in tax law.
Going forward, at least estate planners will be cognizant of
the changes, and can consider the impact of tax when creating trusts. But the
new rules will also apply to trusts that are already in existence, and were
planned on the basis of the rules that imposed tax on the trust. In some cases,
these cannot be changed to adapt to the new rules, in which cases the result
will be that the Government of Canada will have distorted estate plans,
including carefully thought out plans intended to balance the interests of spouses
and children in blended families.
No comments:
Post a Comment